Posts Tagged ‘DDD’

Book Review : Implementing Domain-Driven Design

février 11, 2014 Laisser un commentaire

I had a bit of free time recently (I guess finishing the 15 books of Games of thrones I was given did help as well lol), so I could tackle some books resting on my shelves. Among them, Implementing Domain-Driven Design, by Vaughn Vernon.

Well, first of all, contrary to Mobile First Bootstrap (cf previous review), Implementing Domain-Driven Design is a massive kind of book: about 600 pages. With plenty of code samples. And actually, that’s were, IMHO, the book is a pain: it goes too much into details. I don’t care too much of Spring xml config. Or some coherence API details. Or some REST based communications between parts of the same application (heck, is it really a good idea anyway ?). My mind is set more on akka, and turns out Vaugh Vernon just as well.

The level of details and the lengthy code samples really killed my attention times and times again. It’s a pity. A first the book starts well, Vaugh Vernon does a great job highlighting the usual pitfalls of non Domain Driven Design. It really rings a bell quite a few times. But then, the technical details get in the way, especially for opinionated coder like me. Supposedly immutable value objects without final fields always hurts me. The extensive use of static methods as well (I just remind one « disclaimer » saying it was for the sake of concision, and pretty late in the book).

That’s why, I think, very detailed and framework related code samples are quite a gamble in a « design level book » : if you don’t care too much about the frameworks and some code hurts your eyes, you tend to forget about the design level stuff.

It wasn’t all bad, for sure. It was nice to go through, again, the ideas contained in Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software (I wrote a review on it in 2010, here). Some refreshers were really welcomed.

Another aspect which disappointed me was a feeling of a lack of « hands on » feedbacks, of first hands experiences/insight. When reading Uddi Dahan, for example, there were plenty of times where I thought « yes, that’s the issue, he nailed it ». It almost didn’t happen on Implementing Domain-Driven Design. Maybe the burden of detailing Spring and the others chosen stacks killed the « light revealing » feedbacks, the perls of wisdoms which really help one progress. Maybe, as well, I’m biased there: I’ve read a lot on the matter, played with akka persistence, helped Uwe creating his homegrown CQRS framework (still unpublished by the way, isn’t it mate ?). And I’ve plenty of design/implementation related questions in mind which haven’t found their answers yet, but maybe only walking the path would provide them. Yet, nothing about handling eventually consistency in the user interface in the book for example, despite it being quickly an issue, potentially at least, in event driven systems. What if events change over time, how to handle such changes in the event store ?

So, to sum up, if you’re planning to use Spring and some RESTish stuff, the details could be a real enhancement of the book. Otherwise, like me, I fear they risk to wear you off quickly, killing the interest of the book. Furthermore, if you’re a lot into event driven/CQRS and the like, these parts aren’t handled with too much details, more as an overview, which might disappoint as well.

Well, I feel a bit hard. I hope I’m not unfair and that my disappointment doesn’t make me harsh. If you think so, let me know…

Étiquettes : , , ,

Book: Domain Driven Design

octobre 1, 2010 1 commentaire

When I first started to work, I knew I was doing crap. Yep, really. We were using old stuff, copy/pasting heavily, editing config files by hand before deploying in production and so on. However, knowing you do crap doesn’t help you doing right, even if you had the occasion.

As time went by, however, I was lucky enough to work with real Software Developers, craftsmen as we would say today, learning a lot on the way.

Yet, even these bright guys were sometimes uneasy. Not on technical stuff, not on infrastructure, but, well, you know, on the classes and the like you’ve to do for your customer. How shall we split the different parts of the requirements? What should be top level code or just « code that works », intended not to be touched more afterwards. To which extend shall we integrate what’s the business requires, or shall we adapt it a bit to our stuff ?

Yet, these foggy stuff are the value of an application. Customers don’t care too much about how nice your XML described UI is. Nor does he care too much about maven and the like. He cares about these (often messy) code doing what he asked for. The code which enables dealership to get their good in time. The code which triggers automatically some buy on some mutual funds. The code which allows to display the breaking news. The user’s code. And on top of that, whatever the nice technical layers around, if the users’ domain is badly understood and/or translated into code, then it’ll be a mess and massive pain to work with.

Domain Driven Design is all about this code which actually is, or at least should be, the heart of your application. This « domain » code is where the real value is. Ṫhe book makes the obvious visible again: the domain, the users’ stuff, is what matters. Even better, the books describes plenty of means to handle this part of your application, from quite low lever to high ones. How to handle large domain. How to refactor towards greater insight (a chapter title actually). It even has a chapter called Strategic Design, speaking about how to handle these different domains which always coexist, and how to make the best of them. Most important of all, the books is all about the UBIQUITOUS LANGUAGE.

The uppercase is not mistake: the UBIQUITOUS LANGUAGE is what allows users and developers to understand each other effectively and over time. It matters. The UBIQUITOUS LANGUAGE deserves its uppercase. And by doing so constantly in the book, with the core concepts, Eric Evans makes it obvious what matters or not. After reading the book all these big uppercase words will stick to your mind with ease. ANTI CORRUPTION LAYER. REPOSITORIES. BOUNDED CONTEXT. They’re all still there 🙂

To tell more about the UBIQUITOUS LANGUAGE, it’s the language used to describe the domain, both by the users and the developers. It is should be reflected in the code. And, of the highest importance, is should evolve with the comprehension of the needs. This is the domain. This is the added value of your work. Eric Evans takes care of showing ways to handle this UBIQUITOUS LANGUAGE and make it pervasive and effective. His examples are clearly first hand ones, which smell and look like what you could expect tomorrow (or on Monday rather lol). No big word on SOA or Agile Manifesto. No, just how to make your users needs properly fulfilled. On top of that, the author speaks of organization at the code level and higher ones (like what to do with big blobs of codes or legacy systems). This uncommon « elevation » is very nice and helpful. Speaking of more than the GOF patterns as a way to make your code base intelligible is very nice. In fact, the book’s title second part « Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software », is true and right to the topic.

I guess you got it, I liked this book. It makes you think and ponder often, on your current practices and on « industry wide » ones. Like the habit of affecting the best developers to the infrastructure teams. Common isn’t it ? These top notch guys can then develop some stack able to solve both desktops and web needs, transparently and recursively. Sounds all good, but is this what your users want ? They want their needs fulfilled, they want their reality to be tackled. And whatever your bells and whistles, if you can’t move stuff Y to point 1243, it’s no help.

Well, I fear I’m too verbose. By the way, the book is quite verbose as well. More than 500 pages and extensive texts. Reading it took quite some time, even if I liked it. It was just big, both in volume of text and on impact of its content. But it didn’t go in the way, apart that at the end I was wondering about stuff explain at the beginning. But then, no big deal: for sure I’ll read it again.

To kind of conclude, this book is the last bit of theory I was missing towards making great software, in the long run, in a sustainable way, for the users. It has already changed the way I approach design and it looks like my users felt and liked it already.

I already said too much: I’m off !


Étiquettes : , , , ,
%d blogueurs aiment cette page :